On May 8, 12:36 pm, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
How may people do you think were in on the conspiracy?

A few dozen were fully active or in charge of pulling off the show, a
few hundred and possibly a thousand had to know everything and
participate under our nondisclosure rules(or else), and of most
everyone else was so compartmentalized to death and otherwise
downright scared to death to even think anything that was the least
bit in question of whatever they and others were doing. Signing that
nondisclosure policy is what gave our DARPA/NASA goons the legal right
to having you and your family exterminated for breaking any part of
that nondisclosure policy, and they were extremely serious about it.

Well, we are making progress. About a thousand
conspirators, you say.

So what did they do?

Having the official means, motive and opportunity, they did whatever
they could with the best available technology and expertise of their
cloak and dagger day, in order to create the illusion of our having
landed upon and having walked for hours upon hours unscaved upon that
physically dark as coal moon of ours.

You obviously didn't bother to absorb anything as contributed by
Koobee Wublee, perhaps because it doesn't much help your side of this
argument.

The old Raytheon/TRW Space Data Report that I’d previously posed as
one of my basis for consideration, as such had their GSO annual
irradiation impact upon internal satellite components as being
shielded by a minimum of 5/16” aluminum, pegged at 2e3 Sv/yr (200,000
rads/yr as shielded by 2 g/cm2). Of course, that GSO situation is
right smack in the badlands of those Van Allen belts, so it’s likely
somewhat less irradiated once that same shielded component is taken
external or outside of that saturated zone (obviously best in LEO well
below the Van Allen belts and at all cost avoiding the SAA contour).

However, going in the buff outside of the Van Allen badlands isn’t
much better off, especially if your frail DNA is only shielded by a
spacesuit/moonsuit of 0.5 g/cm2 that’s equal to 0.8mm of aluminum
while having your moonsuit butt taking those EVAs upon our physically
dark and double IR roasting moon. Not to mention the unavoidably
reactive nature of our anticathode moon itself being so electrostatic
charged and by far the hottest gamma thing in town, and then by day
representing the worst kind of gamma plus hard-X-ray saturated place
to be, as unavoidably much worse off than being situated within the
Van Allen badlands of anything GSO worthy.

The IC “RH Level” of 300 krad/yr on behalf of those sufficiently
radhard solid state components, as having been a well established
standard of exactly what kind of rad-hard toughness these GSO rated
ICs have to be, as such a requirement is simply further proof-positive
that our original Raytheon/TRW Space Data Report of 200 krad/yr while
shielded by 2 g/cm2 (5/16” aluminum) is in fact what can be expected
in GSO, though obviously worse yet if those circuits are having to
survive any significant halo CME events. Most of our DoD satellites
as incorporating such mission critical components are likely shielded
by nearly 10 g/cm2 (38 mm of aluminum), and perhaps some of that
circuitry getting protected by as much as 51 mm or 12.75 g/cm2.
Fortunately, the modern day volume of such critical components is
getting smaller if not micro, so not all that much extra or added mass
in the way of their radiation shielding is required.
. - Brad Guth