"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote in message
...
| Dear El Enrrabadore-mor:
|
| "El Enrrabadore-mor" wrote in
| message ...
| ...
| With constant acceleration you can double, triple, or
| 10^101 the distance, that nothing changes about the
| acceleration caused by the effect.
|
| With Hubble expansion, you double the distance, you
| double the effect. If you want to apply it in some other
| fashion, you need another model. You should know
| this. You Have No Model.
|
| If I double the distance, then I double the effect?
| This one is very funny.
| It is not Hubble constant a CONSTANT?
| If it's a constant effect, how can it double?
|
| http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_02.htm
| ... especially
| v = H_o * D_now
|
| ... and ...
| 1+z = exp(v/c)
| ... with (1+z) = wavelength_measured / original_wavelength
|
| Double distance, more than double wavelength observed.
|
| I cannot believe you don't even remember the formula Ho came
| from.
|
| Yet the "blue shift" (not "red shift") never varies as the
| distance increases.
|
| Since you are now in the "duck and hide" stage, I will leave you
| to your personal misery. Good luck with whatever it is you think
| you accomplish with showing off your ignorance this way.

ABUSE! Report it!
Oh wait... He's a ****ing idiot that doesn't know his own name anyway.
Carry on calling the **** ignorant.




| How can someone work with the tools of others, and have no
| conception of what they were created for? "Convenience" seems
| too easy an answer...
|
| David A. Smith
|
|