On May 7, 3:57Â*am, YBM wrote:
rbwinn a écrit :

On May 6, 4:34�pm, YBM wrote:
rbwinn wrote:
No, you have no answer to the use of velocities, so you claim it is a
violation of some kind or some kind of heresy against science.
You can continue to be stupid and ignorant if you like... but, please,
stop lying, especially when the proofs of your lies resides a few posts
above.

Lies? Â*What do you claim I am lying about? Â*

Don't you read even what you write ?

you have no answer to the use of velocities

I've especially adressed this point, but you didn't read.

you claim it is a violation of some kind or some kind of heresy against science

I've never written such a claim. Your failure to grasp (or your
unwillingness to try) what is a space-time equation of movement
(in Galilean Relativity as well as in Special Relativity) is your
burden, not mine.

Well, you can try to make things complicated, but it still just comes
down to one clock running slower than another. All you have to do is
convert the time of the slower clock to the time of the faster one and
use that time in the Galilean transformation equations. Or if that
does not suit you, you can talk about relativity of simultaneity and
distance contraction with scientists.
Robert B. Winn