View Single Post
  #104  
Old May 7th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,993
Default Time dilatation in circular motion

On May 6, 3:20 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 6, 1:05 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:


[snip whatever]


There is no need to snip whatever trollish actions. Here is the post
that you have so much trouble on.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...58e4926ae7ed82

A brief reading of your repeated spew shows that you still do not
understand that the Lorentz transform is only valid for inertial
frames and that the acceleration [v --- -v] by the returning twin
breaks the symmetry that you try to use with the PoR.


Your brief reading is so much fouled. That is why you remain a multi-
year super-senior at the very prestigious University of Alaska
majoring in basket weaving. shrug
Ads
 

Loans - Adverse Credit Remortgage - Remortgages - Mobile Phone - Online Loans