On May 6, 3:22 pm, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 10:37 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 2:01 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
Tell me this then. What _exactly_ did happen?
Martin Hogbin
We've done that at least a million times. Didn't do any good, did it.
One more time would not hurt then. How did they fake it?

Martin Hogbin

I take it that your PC/MAC doesn't do any "search for" basics.

Ever heard of utilizing our moon's L1? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of Nauru (aka guano island)? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of a Chapel Bell S-Band transponder? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of UV secondary/recoil black-light giving a bluish/purplish
hue or tint to most everything in sight? (didn't think so)

All you can do is bluff and bluster. Why not answer my
question? What did they do to fake the landing?

Martin Hogbin

Are we being funny? Why of course, funny.

Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as of missions A-11, A-14
and A-16?

They/Apollo simply faked anything and everything having to do with the
moon's surface, and of those essentially naked EVAs is just the best
ever hoax icing on their moon landing cake.

BTW, our physically dark moon isn't illuminated by way of any xenon
arc lamp spectrum.
.. - Brad Guth