"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 May 2008 14:26:44 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:
"George Hammond" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:53:46 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:
Michael Moroney wrote:
George Hammond writes:
Hey, Phd physicist; tell us how a dog whistle works.....
tell us why half of the audible reality that a dog can hear
is audibally INVISIBLE to a human being?
From that maybe you can figure out why the fact that a
kid has HALF the movie Picture Fusion Frequency of and adult
means that half the world that an adult can see is invisible
to the kid.
Actually George has this backwards (no surprise here). Kids can hear
higher frequencies than adults and the ability to hear high
frequencies
decreases with age. Google "mosquito ringtone" to see how kids take
advantage of this in schools and elsewhere.
[Doug, alleged physicist, SPOG heckler]
Maybe that means that god is a very young person when he listens to
things and a very old one when he watches things. That cannot be
right though since light travels faster than sound.
[Hammond]
Don't be ridiculous. You've been told a thousand times
that children are only an EXEMPLAR of the effect that
actually causes "God" in the population, and that is the
Secular Trend in Human Growth, which causes the average
person in the human population to only reach about 80% of
full growth...... and this is WHY there is a "God". Stupid
huckster.
Unsupported (insane, psychotic and unscientific) assertion ............
where's the EVIDENCE, ********??????
[Hammond]
For the tenth time jackass, the eivdence is cited
meticulously by (author, year) in my peer published papers:
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proo...ammond5s1.html
For the 100th time, **** for brains (posted by me and others) Those are NOT
"Scientific Peer reviewed journals".
Even THEY admit to that!
You have NEVER shown ANY connection between the works you cite - and the
crap you spew.
You have only added to the pile of horse **** you shovel!
I can claim "Pat Boone's singing of "Blue Suede Shoes" proves that I am god.
It means NOTHING unless I can show a VALID and SCIENTIFIC connection between
the two.
Were you a real scientist, you would recognize that!