"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 May 2008 14:34:13 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:


"George Hammond" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 06 May 2008 02:37:05 GMT, "John Smith"

[John Smith, wannabee SPOG critic]
No.
When was yours tested?
By whom?
Where is their report?
Where is this "evidence" that connects earlier work to supporting your
spoc


[Hammond]
All the supporting evidence is cited by (author,year) in
my published papers and listed in the bibliography.



[John Smith, wannabee SPOG critic]
You did not answer THE question!


[Hammond]
Answered 10 times, you're repeating yourself heckler.


NEVER answered, liar!




[John Smith, wannabee SPOG critic]
What experiments DID YOU DO?


[Hammond]
Hammond didn't do any experiments, Einstein didn't do any
experiments, and Dirac didn't do any experiments, we are not
experimentalists, dip****, we're theorists.

First thing, Einstein and Dirac did REAL scientific work.
You are not Einstein.
You are no Dirac.
You, and your bogus claims, cannot be compared, in ANY way, to either
scientist or the REAL and VALID scientific work THEY did.

Their thories, were tested BY OTHERS - even after their death.
They made predictions that WERE testable - even if they, themselves,
wouldn;t be around to test them.

You have NO ONE testing your crap - because everyone knows it's crap.

YOU, admittedly, have not tested it!

THEY show a connection between previous works, and their own.
You only bellow that these others are supportive of your claaims - but show
NO connection.

You CANNOT claim a "proof" on one hand, and call yourself a theorist on the
other. That is nothing more than egomaniacal fraud.

Apparently you know nothing about the difference between a theory and a
"proof"

Even as a theory, your crap is laughable.
Claimng it is a proof - only reflects your own insanity.

Ha! Some scientist!