On Tue, 6 May 2008 01:36:10 -0700 (PDT), Roger Pearse
wrote:

On 6 May, 03:17, "John Smith" wrote:
"Roger Pearse" wrote in message

...
On 5 May, 12:58, "John Smith" wrote:

"Roger Pearse" wrote in message
Well, why not digest this into a web page, and just link to it?

There is no need to summarize and post a webpage about Hammond's
work. It is so outrageously wrong ...

Although I don;t recall where it is; there is a web page showing all the
false and insane claims George has made (which pretty much includes
everything he's ever posted or written).

That's the sort of thing we need, written calmly and sensibly.

Well, I don't understand what George's theory is. But I don't learn
from any of these posts here what it is either.

What I do see is that all the posts which are critical of it (and him
-- surely irrelevant?) are no more than what George called
'heckling'.

The only valid point someone has made in defense of George was something
like "it's not nice to make fun of, and tease, the mentally
retarded."

While true, I haven't seen anybody make a valid point *against* George
yet.

There have been many; maybe you just weren't paying attention.
Most start out making valid points against what George claims - but they
soon find out that George is just an ignorant moron making the same crap
claims over and over again.

How about the latest - where George fraudulently cites his 40 year old CVs
as validation of his claims, then attacks someone who has a Ph.D. because
they aren't as smart (as he)?

All the best,

Roger Pearse

I note that you have written your comments in such a manner as to make
it seem that the above remarks are by me. They are not.

All the best,

Roger Pearse


[Hammond]
Oh I'm sure that is quite accidental Roger.... hecklers
don't care what they say, they have no intention of logical
discourse, the point is only to make loud derogatory
comments.
By the way, you didn't answer my question about the
origin of the Trinity in Xtianity. You do realize that the
SPOG shows that the 3 Branches and BI/2P system are based on
the (representations of) the Trinity and the Quadrature
(4-Gospel) canon?
I have been unable to trace the patronistic origin of the
Trinity?
Any suggestions as to where it cme from?
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================