"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 May 2008 02:37:05 GMT, "John Smith"

[John Smith, wannabee SPOG critic]
No.
When was yours tested?
By whom?
Where is their report?
Where is this "evidence" that connects earlier work to supporting your
spoc


[Hammond]
All the supporting evidence is cited by (author,year) in
my published papers and listed in the bibliography.

You did not answer THE question!
What experiments DID YOU DO?
What evidence did YOU find? (valid - not your usual bull ****)
What connections (again, evidence) do YOU have that shows the previous
experiments are even relted to SPOC?

You HAVE none.
You have, delusionaly and fraudulently, LIED that these cites actually
support SPOC!


The
peer published papers are posted online and have been cited
1000 times.

and each timre it has been SHOWN that they are NOT "peer reviewed"
scientific papers!!!!!
(using quotes directly from the publishers and editors themselves!!!)


If you're too lazy to read it, that's YOUR
problem not mine. I don't runprivate tutorials for
hecklers. If you want to be a heckler, you'll have to do
your own reading.

You don't do anything but dance your psychotic two step pretending it's
science, and you're actually a scientist.


If you were more positive and cooperative I'd help you,
but I'm not gonna feed a heckler and loudmoth asshole with
private tutorials... remember.... you're the enemy, not an
ally.

I started out asking questions and posting rational, serious AND scientific
rebuttals.
You ignored them ... insulted me - and ran away!
As you ALWAYS do!


I'm the enemy of a totally psychotic, fraudulent, ignorant egomaniac?
That's fine with me.