On Tue, 06 May 2008 02:24:43 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:


"George Hammond" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 05 May 2008 09:16:48 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

Roger Pearse wrote:
On 5 May, 12:58, "John Smith" wrote:
"Roger Pearse" wrote in message
Well, why not digest this into a web page, and just link to it?
There is no need to summarize and post a webpage about Hammond's
work. It is so outrageously wrong ...
Although I don;t recall where it is; there is a web page showing all
the
false and insane claims George has made (which pretty much includes
everything he's ever posted or written).

That's the sort of thing we need, written calmly and sensibly.

Well, I don't understand what George's theory is. But I don't learn
from any of these posts here what it is either.
What I do see is that all the posts which are critical of it (and him
-- surely irrelevant?) are no more than what George called
'heckling'.
The only valid point someone has made in defense of George was
something
like "it's not nice to make fun of, and tease, the mentally
retarded."

While true, I haven't seen anybody make a valid point *against* George
yet.

All the best,

Roger Pearse

This is kind of sad. Lot of valid points against his nonsense have been
made. He just swears and insults in return.

Lets go over some of them. He predicts the Greeks had 13 gods. They
had 12. That is a valid scientific objection. His defense is to say
that they either could not count or did not care that they were wrong.

He claims his fusion frequency graph proves god. There is no connection
between these two things. He does not try to make a connection. He
just states it without any proof. He cannot give any proof because there
is none. You cannot refute baseless assertions if the other person is
not looking for the truth.

His theory is much like me claiming that you are a monster from outer
space in human form. You would then, logically, point out that you
are human and I would claim that that is proof of my statement since
only aliens could have the technology to make a perfect human appearing
being. Then when you brought out your baby pictures and school records,
I would start swearing and insulting.


[Hammond]
Hey, Phd physicist; tell us how a dog whistle works.....
tell us why half of the audible reality that a dog can hear
is audibally INVISIBLE to a human being?


[John Smith, SPOG critic]
You don't know?
Hell, we learned that in high school.

[Hammond]
No **** Sherlock, and yet hecklers want to sit here and
argue about it.


There is no such thing as "audibly (correct spelling) invisible". It's
called "inaudible".


[Hammond]
Same difference.



From that maybe you can figure out why the fact that a
kid has HALF the movie Picture Fusion Frequency of and adult
means that half the world that an adult can see is invisible
to the kid.

All one can figure from that is that you don't know your ass from a hole in
the ground!

[John Smith, SPOG critic]
You cannot take the differences between what a human and a dog can hear -
and transpose that to what two different humans can see.



[Hammond]
Oh yes you can.

[John Smith, SPOG critic]
Were you a REAL scientist - you would know that!


[Hammond]
I am a real scientist, that's why I know it.


[John Smith, SPOG critic]
And then from that maybe youcan figure out
that since the Secualr Trend says that the average human is
only 80% fully grown, why it is that 20% of REALITY is
INVISIBLE to the average person, and why it is called HEAVEN
and why the hypothetically fully grown man is considered an
INVISIBLE MAN who lives in this invisble world and is called
GOD.
HALFASS, LOUDMOUTH, STUPID JACKASS!

[John Smith, SPOG critic]
Your claims about "secular trend" are nothing more than a pile of
"unsupported assertions" bull ****!


[Hammond]
Bull****.....the Secular Trend in Human Growth was
discovered 100 years ago and is currently one of the most
well known and throughly researched phenomenons in all of
modern science. Here's a full length TIME MAGAZINE COVER
STORY about it:
http://economics.sbs.ohio-state.edu/...cles/time3.htm

You don't know what you're talking about.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================