View Single Post
  #20  
Old May 6th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
rbwinn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,568
Default constancy of light

On May 5, 5:42�pm, YBM wrote:
rbwinn wrote:

[lot's of stuff he didn't even read]

Good to see you back down. �I will just have to live with whatever
Google does with tabulations. �I am not subsidized by the government
the way scientists are.


Mozilla Thunderbird is free.

Here is what I do with the Galilean transformation equations.


[snip]

I don't care. You have problem with basic issues which concern
GT as well as LT. It's not LT you don't undersand, it's x=ct
or x=-ct. Evading outside of the scope of what you pretended
before is a useless strategy : I don't care beating you, I'd
like to understand at least a bit on basic physics.

Please read carefully what *you* said at the initial post of
this thread, and as crefully what I responded then.


Well, you say there are issues with the Galilean transformation
equations. I don't see any. t'=t. You have another clock running
slower than a t' clock. Convert the rate of time to t'. Everything
works. What is the problem you see?
Robert B. Winn
Ads
 

iPhone Reviews - Debt Help - Bad Credit Mortgages - Bad Credit Loan - Refinance