constancy of light
On May 5, 5:42�pm, YBM wrote:
rbwinn wrote:
[lot's of stuff he didn't even read]
Good to see you back down. �I will just have to live with whatever
Google does with tabulations. �I am not subsidized by the government
the way scientists are.
Mozilla Thunderbird is free.
Here is what I do with the Galilean transformation equations.
[snip]
I don't care. You have problem with basic issues which concern
GT as well as LT. It's not LT you don't undersand, it's x=ct
or x=-ct. Evading outside of the scope of what you pretended
before is a useless strategy : I don't care beating you, I'd
like to understand at least a bit on basic physics.
Please read carefully what *you* said at the initial post of
this thread, and as crefully what I responded then.
Well, you say there are issues with the Galilean transformation
equations. I don't see any. t'=t. You have another clock running
slower than a t' clock. Convert the rate of time to t'. Everything
works. What is the problem you see?
Robert B. Winn
|