Physics Banter - View Single Post

**John Smith**

"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 05 May 2008 11:51:03 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

"George Hammond" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 04 May 2008 22:11:38 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

"George Hammond" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:

[Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have
done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done
before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the
hypothesis,
not the verification of it.

[Hammond]
Look asshole, it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!
The SPOG is confirmed by:

150 years of Biology research in embryology by Roux,
Conklin, Speman, Dreisch and others.

100- years of neuropsychology research by Bell-Magendie,
Sperry, McClain and others.

80 years of General Relativity research.

50 years of computer research extraction of eignvector
models Psychometry including the Eysenck-3, AVA-4, Big-5,
Brand-6, Cattell-7, Saucier-8, Cattel-13 and many others...
in fact EVERY published psychometric model in the
literature.

110 years of measurement of the Picture Fusion Frequency
(PFF) since the time of Thomas Edison and recently by Lehrl
and Fischer.

80 years of research on the Secular Trend in human growth by
the WHOI, Unicef, Red Cross and hundreds of academic
studies.

40 years of modern measurements of IQ vis. Mental Speed.

20 years of research on the Anthropic Principle in Physics.

The list goes on, and is all cited in my published papers.

ALL THIS EVIDENCE is EQUIVALENT to Leverrier's Perihelion
measurement in GR. Einstein was right about GR, and Hammond
is right about the SPOG.

[John Smith]
Claiming ancient works support your crap MEANS NOTHING - since those
people
are not around to deny your warped claims!

[Hammond]
Baloney, Leverrier's measurement of the Perihelion of
Mercury was the ONLY experimental support for Einstein when
he published GR, and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time.

Was it verified by later testing?
Was yours?

[Hammond]
Leverrier's study was a lifetime work, checked, double
checked and triple checked, and reviewed by hundreds of
exoperts, same with the evidence that confirms the SPOG. Who
are you kiddin?

No.
When was yours tested?
By whom?
Where is their report?
Where is this "evidence" that connects earlier work to supporting your spoc
(and I DON'T mean just your own ignorant bellowing that is does .... I mean
REAL and VALID evidence provided by other scientists)???

You don't have any!
These are the types of points you run away from - because they openly show
you and your crap to be nothing more than unscientific and fraudulent!