constancy of light
rbwinn wrote:
[lot's of stuff he didn't even read]
Good to see you back down. I will just have to live with whatever
Google does with tabulations. I am not subsidized by the government
the way scientists are.
Mozilla Thunderbird is free.
Here is what I do with the Galilean transformation equations.
[snip]
I don't care. You have problem with basic issues which concern
GT as well as LT. It's not LT you don't undersand, it's x=ct
or x=-ct. Evading outside of the scope of what you pretended
before is a useless strategy : I don't care beating you, I'd
like see you understand at least a bit on basic physics.
Please read carefully what *you* said at the initial post of
this thread, and as crefully what I responded then.
|