On May 4, 10:50*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 4, 8:10*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:





On May 4, 7:20 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

On May 4, 4:27 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
Then, you have to justify why Schwarzschild’s original solution is a
transform of Hilbert’s solution, and Mr. Corthers has to justify why
Hilbert’s solution is a transform of Schwarzschild’s original
solution. *As I have pointed out, both solutions are asymptotically
flat, spherically symmetric, and static. *Both solutions at weak
gravitation are compatible with Newtonian law of gravity. *So, what
else decides them apart?

Nothing decides them apart as they are the exact same solution in
different coordinate systems. This has been explained to you so many
times it is unbelievable.

When the field equations are written in their specific form waiting
for the solutions to be solved, the set of coordinate system is
already decided. *

Nope - not true. Won't stop you from repeating it as if it were
though!

[snip remaining irrelevancies]- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Event horizons predict infinitely blueshifted light going in and
infinitely redshifted light going out when emitted there. They are
nonsense predictions.

Mitch Raemsch;Twice Nobel Laureate 2008