"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 04 May 2008 22:11:38 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:
"George Hammond" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:
[Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have
done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the hypothesis,
not the verification of it.
[Hammond]
Look asshole, it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!
The SPOG is confirmed by:
150 years of Biology research in embryology by Roux,
Conklin, Speman, Dreisch and others.
100- years of neuropsychology research by Bell-Magendie,
Sperry, McClain and others.
80 years of General Relativity research.
50 years of computer research extraction of eignvector
models Psychometry including the Eysenck-3, AVA-4, Big-5,
Brand-6, Cattell-7, Saucier-8, Cattel-13 and many others...
in fact EVERY published psychometric model in the
literature.
110 years of measurement of the Picture Fusion Frequency
(PFF) since the time of Thomas Edison and recently by Lehrl
and Fischer.
80 years of research on the Secular Trend in human growth by
the WHOI, Unicef, Red Cross and hundreds of academic
studies.
40 years of modern measurements of IQ vis. Mental Speed.
20 years of research on the Anthropic Principle in Physics.
The list goes on, and is all cited in my published papers.
ALL THIS EVIDENCE is EQUIVALENT to Leverrier's Perihelion
measurement in GR. Einstein was right about GR, and Hammond
is right about the SPOG.
[John Smith]
Claiming ancient works support your crap MEANS NOTHING - since those
people
are not around to deny your warped claims!
[Hammond]
Baloney, Leverrier's measurement of the Perihelion of
Mercury was the ONLY experimental support for Einstein when
he published GR, and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time.
Was it verified by later testing?
Was yours?
[Hammond]
Besides, the bulk of the research which supports the SPOG
dates from AFTER the invention of the electronic computer
(post 1970). TENS OF THOUSANDS of Factor Analytic
experiments on MILLIONS of people using MAINFRAME
EIGENVECTOR EXTRACTION from 100x100 matrices, or large,
confirm overwhelmingly that Hammond's SPOG is correct, and
that God is a CURVATURE of reality caused by the Secular
Trend Growth Deficit.
Then why aren't these same people yelling out support for your crap?
Simply because you have warped their writings and work so much - they don't
even recognize it anymore.
You can vclaim, all you want, that "2 + 2 proves SPOG.
The truth (called reality to us) is, IT DOESN'T!
Historic research from other fields LIKEWISE confirm it,
notably the PFF (Picture Fusion Frequency) measurements, and
notably the entire history of IQ testing.
You bellowed this particulalr crap before - and it was, like everything else
you propose, shown to be nothing more than blatantly ignorant delusions.
Cartesian (orthogonal) Stem Cell cleavage in Embryology is
also well known and a foundation stone of the proof.
Sperry's historic L-R brain discovery is also a major
buttress of the theory as are THOUSANDS of other researches
in diverse fields, all cited in my paper.
Cited - maybe ....
actual proof or evidence .....
that's laughable!
The FIRST post I made against your crap was that you had absolutely NOTHING
to support your "secular growth trend" except your own psychotic
conclusions.
YOU HAD NO EVIDENCE for ANY of the claims you made.
You ran away, and never even hinted at supplying evidence (experiments or
otherwise) to reach your conclusions.