Dear El Enrrabadore-mor:

"El Enrrabadore-mor" wrote in
message ...
....
Nevertheless, there are two pillar stones in
Physics:
1 - Conservation of Angular Momentum.
(No matter if it is circular motion or linear
motion. For circular motion the conservation
only exists relative to the center of rotation, but
for linear motion conservation exists relative to
every point in space);
2 - Conservation of Energy.

Now, energy is the time derivative of the
angular momentum, and that time is an
absolute time.

No, energy is the path integral of momentum. The energy is a
function of the observer's frame, so it clearly involves
*nothing* absolute.

How can the above two pillar stones of
Physics survive in view of time dilatation
(and time not being absolute after all)?

Because "absolute" is something artificially impressed by *human*
expectation.

David A. Smith