View Single Post
  #39  
Old May 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,878
Default Time dilatation in circular motion

On May 4, 2:32*am, "Prof Barnhart" wrote:
I don't usually post here because I don't agree with the present state of
theoretical physics.


Idiot alert.

Specifically, why must so many equate the concept of a designed and created
universe with
religious fanatacism. *I will probably encounter the usual attacks and go
away again for several years, but here goes. *see below


/Creationist/ idiot alert. This'll be fun!


"El Enrrabadore-mor" wrote in message

...

It is said that a speeding clock shows less elapsed time than
the stay-at-home clock, because (if already speeding) it is
running at a slower rate. Or else, because it had run at a
slower rate when it was speeding, assuming now it is
stopped near the stay-at-home clock.


The funny thing about this is that time and length change
at the same time, but not the ratio between both (velocity).


If we keep length constant, the only possible solution is
uniform circular motion. That is a twin travelling in circles,
of constant radius r, around the first twin assumed to be
stopped at the center of rotation.


First as I recall, Einstein (he wasn't an idiot) equates gravity and
acceleration. *I must say here that if gravity affects the path of EMR then
it is logical to assume that it is a form of electromagnetism.


Does that mean a prism is a form of electromagnetism?

[snip remaining stupidity]

I have to ask...professor of WHAT?
Ads
 

Bad Credit Loan - Hotels - Cheap Magazines - Mortgages - Advertising