On Apr 25, 3:53 pm, Rock Brentwood wrote:
On Apr 24, 6:29 am, Eric Gisse wrote:

Am I the only one who is impressed by the sheer complexity of the
arguments supporting the conspiracy theory?...

"The treacherous are ever distrustful, seeking out conspiracies" --
Lord of the Rings (slight paraphrase)

Complexity is evasion from simple truths. One cannot deny what's
directly in the line of sight, plainly visible for all to see...

Your eyes can see at better than 10 m/pixel? (I'm impressed)

Do share and share alike. Please, let us see whatever it is that you
see with your very own two eyes, or otherwise objectively touch with
your wise finger.
.. - Brad Guth


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ts_on_the_Moon

The analogy would be for a conspiracy nut-case to proclaim (on a
soapbox at noontime on a cloudless day) that there is no sun and that
assertions to the contrary are simply a ploy by a colluding clique of
astronomers to boondoggle the public into supporting solar energy
(which, according to the conspiracy theorist, would then actually be a
secret programme to install 2-ways microwave sensors and transmitters
throughout the land to control the public's brainwaves, since there
would be no sun for the solar energy to be solar of)..