On Apr 23, 7:47 pm, wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:33 am, BradGuth wrote:



On Apr 22, 4:14 am, wrote:

On Apr 22, 6:21 am, "Paul B. Andersen"

wrote:
skrev:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from theApollohoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

No stars?
Must be fakes! :-)

I have personally never contested the "no stars" argument. I have
found those who do use that argument are covert agents. That argument
appeals to the "conspiracy" people but does nothing for the
"debunking" people. That argument makes both crowds happy but
increases the argumentors credibility with the "conspiracy" crowd.
This is a common technique that cointelpro cowards use to infiltrate
and consequently subvert groups. Most people simply can't figure that
one out.

Eric Hufschmid is a case-point example of that. He used that argument
to gain credibility withApolloHoax exposers but it did nothing to
help the sheeple.

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/-Hidequotedtext -

- Show quoted text -

Venus was no star.

Various cosmological features should've been visible onApollo
cameras, but as JAXA Kaguya photos revealed not necessarily all stars.
Certain individuals were focusing exclusively on the "no stars"
argument and they turned out to be agents. No wonder.

Any 3D interactive orbital simulator proves that upon missions A-11,
A-14 and A-16 Venus should have been extremely obvious and easily
included within a given FOV that would not have included the sun, but
would have included the lunar horizon, or possibly that of Earth.

Usenet/Groups are chuck full of DARPA and MI5/CIA spooks and moles.
It's what they do best while out of bed.
.. - Brad Guth