George Hammond writes:

On Sun, 4 May 2008 15:51:53 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:

This makes George's claims of science publication bypassing the scientific
method 0 for 7. That right, George. Zero cases. You got it wrong each
time.

Therefore, the
S.P.O.G. is not the first "purely theoretical discovery
based on existing data" in scientific history.

That's right, simply because it's definitely not any sort of "discovery"

Dirac never did any experiments,
and neither did I, I simply "theoretically explained the
existing phenomenon of God"

Here we have your admission of not following the scientific method. You
did no experiments.

Neither did Einstein, moron.

What about the solar eclipse/star position I've mentioned a half dozen
times? What about the photoelectric effect?

Or is your claim that other people did the eclipse observation instead of
Einstein himself or something? Remember, what is necessary is the
scientist _proposes_ the experiment that will verify or refute the
hypothesis. Others can do the experiment in collaboration with the
scientists, if he give them proper credit. Einstein's proposed experiment
was quite clear: If he was correct, you'll see a star _here_.

OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the hypothesis,
not the verification of it.