Mike wrote:
jem wrote:
kenseto wrote:
My question: What is the cause for the traveling clock shows less
elapsed time than the stay-at-home clock? This question arises because
you and Roberts denied that the traveling clock shows less elapsed
time because it is running at a slower rate.

This has been explained to you so many times, Seto, that a rock would
understand by now.

According to the Uncertainty Principle, the initial photons misses the
target in the vertical direction so the light path length of the rod are
shorter, so the traveling twins clock are less.

You are probably joking because the uncertainty principle is not part
of SR, which deals at the macro level where events are kinematics are
deterministic. In other words, h = 0 in SR, as well as G =0.

It's a joke in the sense of being laughable, but "jem" is not the
origin. Try a Google advanced group search for "uncertainty principle"
with author Kenseto.


--
--Bryan