"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 04 May 2008 03:52:01 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:


"George Hammond" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 03 May 2008 20:51:39 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:



Unsupported assertion!
There were NO experiments perormed.
Please, disprove that and show some!!!!!!


[Hammond]
LIAR. Here's a list of the Psychmetric experiments taken
from the bibliography opf my 1994 peer published paper
(Pergam Press), you don't know what you're talking about,
and you are a LIAR:

REFERENCE

[

[John Smith, atheist, raving S.P.O.G. critic]
?????????????????
This, unless you warp it just as much as you psychotically warp everything
else, has nothing to do with your SPO Crap!
There's nothing here that is even remoely related to physics!

All of these things are related to social behavior and psychology ....
fields in which you have ABSOLUTELY NO degree!
IOW - your claimed CV's mean NOTHING here.

[Hammond]
All of these are published reports of EXPERIMENTAL Factor
Analytic eigenvector extractions from experimental
psychological correlation matrices.

Bull ****!
You're just making warped and deranged claims about what was actually
written.
Still, it has NOTHING TO DO with physics.



What I've discovered
is what CAUSES THE EIGENVECTOR STRUCTURE, and that is a
PHYSICS problem, because it turns out to be a:

EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF
SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME (i.e. "GOD")
THAT CAUSES THE CURVATURE.

You've "discovered" nothing more than your own psychotic delusions and
warped lies.





Social studies and psychology are not "hard" sciences; so make a "hard
(physics) science" conclusion using them is mere FRAUD.



[Hammond]
Baloney, what it provides is a concise PHYSICS
explanation of God.

Re-claiming the same stupid thing you've been lying about for years does not
make it any less smelly!


Get out of here, you're an uneducated,
scientifically illiterate asshole.

????
And your education in psychology is?
And your education in social studies is?
And you education in the fields shown in ANY of the books cited is?

If I'm so uneducated and scientifically illiterate - why do you keep ducking
even the simplest rebuttal statement I've made?


Whddau think, an
ignorant asshole like you is qualified to understand the
world's first scientific proof of God..... getoutta here!

I am qualified to see a fraudulent, unscientific, psychotic, deranged,
egomaniacal asshole .... you!