Physics Banter - View Single Post

**George Hammond**

On Sun, 4 May 2008 01:14:50 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:

George Hammond writes:

On Sat, 03 May 2008 20:55:19 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

Screw pedant. Dalton's published thesis that historical
data PROVED his thesis that:

"All of chemistry was explained by
atoms combining to form molecules
because integral moles of reagents
were (historically) always combined
in chemical experiments"

was accepted as a PRIMA FACIE proven theory the day he
published it.... he didin't have to repeat the experiments,
they were WELL KNOWN to everybody.
Same with the SPOG, jerk.

Unsupported assertion!
WHAT EXPERIMENTS?
Just because one "CASE" happens by one particular method, does NOT mean
yours gets the same treatment.

Whaddumean "one case"? The annals of Scence are littered
with such cases of "race ipso" discoveries. For instance:

Dalton, Law of Chemical Combination

One case. Maybe.

[Hammond]
That's called a "precedent" in Law. Therefore, the
S.P.O.G. is not the first "purely theoretical discovery
based on existing data" in scientific history. Fact is
there are scores of them, Guth's discovery of Inflation is
an example, Guth isn't an "experimentalist" and neither am
I. Or the Dirac equation which was accepted immediately
because it explained spin... spin was well known BEFORE
Dirac discovered the theoretical explanation for it and for
which he is world famous. Dirac never did any experiments,
and neither did I, I simply "theoretically explained the
existing phenomenon of God" which has been empirically known
and observed for millenia!. Screw dip****.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================