In article
,
kenseto wrote:

On May 2, 4:32*pm, Tom Roberts wrote:
kenseto wrote:
On May 2, 3:15 pm, Tom Roberts wrote:
kenseto wrote:
What's wrong with these pictures???
Your personal misunderstandings.

1. In the twin paradox scenario SR claims that the traveling clock is
running at slower rate than the stay-at-home clock. * [...]
SR simply does NOT claim that. You REALLY need to learn about SR before
attempting to discuss it.

So ACCORDING TO YOU: the traveling clock [...]

NONSENSE! You must learn to read what is written, not what you
personally want the writing to say.
__________________________________________________ ___________
The nonsense is on your part.
Seto said:
In the twin paradox scenario SR claims that the traveling clock is
running at slower rate than the stay-at-home clock.

Roberts said:
SR simply does NOT claim that. You REALLY need to learn about SR
before attempting to discuss it.

Seto said:
So ACCORDING TO YOU: the traveling clock has less elapsed time when it
rejoins the stay-at-home clock is not because it was running at slower
rate than the stay-at-home clock....right? Question: what is the cause
that the traveling clock shows less elapsed time?

Roberts said:
NONSENSE! You must learn to read what is written, not what you
personally want the writing to say.

I asked you a civilized question you refused to answer it. What part
of my question is nonsense??
__________________________________________________ __________________


Your complete and utter inability to actually understand anything about
SR is a long-standing feature around here. It seems likely to me that it
is related to your very poor reading comprehension, as illustrated by
your COMPLETE AND UTTER misunderstanding of what I wrote above.


What you wrote above is completely void of substance. You just gave me
a bunch of bull **** that I don't understand what SR says. But you
refused to tell me what SR is really saying.

Ken Seto

***{You have fallen prey to a very bad fallacy vis-a-vis "relativity,"
Ken. Here is your error: you expect to grab a relativist by the balls,
squeeze as hard as you can, and get "substance" back from him, rather
than very loud screeching and howling. Do you now see where you went
astray in your thinking? :-) --MJ}***

************************************************** ***************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ