On May 3, 11:47 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com wrote:
Smooth John wrote in message





On May 3, 10:54 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com wrote:
Smooth John wrote in message



I cant understand science anymore

As soon as I understand an issue, or even the problematics of an issue,
regarding math, physics and science generally, at least 10 more issues
and problematics arise, pops out from nowhere,

Yes, that is what science is about. Spot on.

making me look more
stupid as I been before

Wrong attitude.
They should make you more intrigued and interested.
You picked the wrong hobby.
Try Cricket Champ Card Collecting.

Dirk Vdm

You didnt got the main issue regarding this issue

Yes I did, but you are insufficiently equipped to understand,
which is not my problem.

Dirk Vdm

You rather lie shamelessly, because if were did understood the issue,
then you had
been regard your answer specific to the issue, but as shown, you did
not in the first place

And you cowardly redirect the answers to your posts to

alt.morons,alt.creep

Your attitude is deplorable, but still tells us that you agree that
you lost, being parallel and
not tangent to this discussion

What you did was parroting attitudes you read somewhere, which is
wrong, and in fact,
your attitude is what gives science a bad name

Anyway, what we need in order to understand more, learn from me, is
for now to decrease
the exponential growth, we need a growth deficit [Hammond 2007] which
eventually will
tell us, at least, if we are going along the right path. If not, then
we need to jump off this
path and lead to get knowledge from another domain which must not be
science