Was Einstein a fake?
On Apr 29, 8:29�pm, Bryan Olson wrote:
rbwinn wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
rbwinn wrote:
Look, after ten or twelve times of trying to get a scientist to admit
that two clocks running at different rates cannot be represented by
the equation t'=t, I think that this basic principle has been
emphasized enough.
There's no question that the same variable cannot represent two
non-equal quantities. The problem is that you claim to use the
Galilean transform, then you contradict the Galilean transform.
I understand what you are saying. �You are a
respected scientist and Party member,
You must have me confused with someone else.
Spoken like a scientist. �Only a scientist could claim that I am
contradicting the Galilean transformation equations by using them.
Spoken like a true kook. It's not the using and no one said it was.
Exactly how am I contradicting the Galilean transformation equations?
You say devices to measure time at rest in S' will find it to be
something other than t'.
No, Bryan, the earth rotates the same number of degrees whether
observed fro S or S', the sun rotates the same number of degrees
whether observed from S or S'. You do have this cesium clock running
slower in S' than an identical clock in S. If a clock is running
slower or faster, it can still be used with the Galilean
transformation equations. You just have to determine the rate of the
clock compared to t'.
Robert B. Winn
|