On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:57:52 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:





[Hammond]

1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is
manifestly a Physics Subject.

No, it is a religious tract which is in conflict with physics
and history. The world did not start when man was "created".
That is false as is the rest of what you said.



[Hammond]
Horse****. "Reality itself" began when Man appeared,
BECAUSE, "Reality", or "observables" have no operational
definition without an "observer".... namely Man.
I'll make it simple: If there is no such thing as an
observer, there can be no such thing as an "observable".
Look. you're pretty stupid and naieve, and the subject of
"God" is a little over your head.... why don't you take a
hike?
Besides that, I am VERY FAMILIAR with your brand of
psychotic disturbance, (anti-religious aggravation) which
can last for DECADES, and know full well that there is no
such thing as a rational discussion with such a person.
Besides that, you opinion isn't worth anything to begin
with.
The ONLY thing you have to offer is the ability to make
some kind of "scientific content" statements.... but you are
so beside yourself with anti-religious aggravation, that you
are UNABLE to even do that. Screw.... you're useless in
this discussion.
You're part of the problem, not part of the solution!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================