John Smith wrote:
"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:01:19 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

[Doug, anonymouss unverified Physics PhD claimer]

you have shown no
connection with a god. This is just you hoping that no
one will notice that this assuming what you want to prove.


[Hammond]
Your answer to that FALSE STATEMENT is posted below, and
you haven't answered it:

[Hammond]
You're so obviously incompetent its pathetic. Look, the
basic plot, as in any scientific investigation, is to
itemize the characteristics of the phenomenon, and then see
if there is any known simple scientific mechanism which
would explain it.

You forgot onoe important step ... (as is usual for ignorant assholes like
you) - what is inivestigated must have a basis in REALITY!
Religious beliefs do NOT!

Only those things that exist in reality have supportive FACTS and EVIDENCE.
Your S.P.O.Crap has produced none of either.

You cannot start out with (your) crap ........ add your own psychotically
delusional, UN-scientific bellows ... and then come up with ANYTHING that
has any relationship to science, reality or sanity!

You're nothing more than a psychotic asshole!



He wants it to be true. He has nothing else to offer so he hopes
he gets glory by doing something that is obviously wrong and then
hoping that no one notices.

None of the steps in his "proof" is connected to any facet of
reality. He takes a few random phrases that have some truth in
them and then puts in conclusions that are totally bogus and
expects people to tell him how great he is. He does not like
it that I have a PhD and he does not so he attacks that rather
than try to defend his nonsense.

Should we pity him or be mad at him? I would go for pity because
he is making himself unhappy.