George Hammond wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:09:29 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:
snip no content line item drivil post
[Hammond]
Your post contains nothing but UNSUPPORTED ASSERTIONS
lacking any factual evidence, while my post is based on peer
reviewed and published papers.
Since you have no answer to the comments, you snip them. That
means you know you are wrong.
Your commentary is idiotic, juvenile and reflects a low
intelligence and little proficiency or experience in
Science.
You CLAIM to have a "PhD in Physics" but refuse to cite
your CV, your real name, or any verification of such. Your
commentary does not rise above the level of the average jr.
grade laboratory technician. Therefore, until you provide
verification of your educational claims, I must presume you
are a FAKE, a FRAUD and an IMPOSTER, and you are certainly
typical of the average ranting aggravated psychotic
atheistic nut.
Your opinion has nothing to do with the validity of my PhD.
The university, my advisor and my committee decided that many
years ago.
It is sad that you consider reasoned comments as ranting. Most
of the world considers swearing and insults as ranting. Maybe
you are right to 7.7%
You still did not tell us what you do for a living.
Many atheist frauds claim false credentials, such as T.
Wake from alt.atheism who also claimed he was a "Physics
PhD" but investigation showed he was in fact a civil
engineer employed in bridge building, or TMG who claimed to
be a "Physics PhD" but who actually turned out to be a WHOI
("Whoee") employee who has a degree in "Ocean Physics" which
any halfwit engineering level graduate could achieve.
Judging from your language and science content surely you
fall in the same category, a half baked near do well
"applied physics" nut, at best, and probably unemployed
judging from your lengthy weekday posts. You're a worthless
screwball.
This sort of paranoid comments shows you know you are wrong
and are trying to bluster.
Finally, because all these screwballs claim they can't
post their CV because they have "high security gov't jobs"
and must remain anonymous (which is crap); I posted a TEST
QUESTION that any COMPETENT Physics PhD should be able to
answer off the top of his head:
Physics PhD Test Question
What is the relationship between the
Dirac gamma matrices of QED and the
Christoffel Symbols of General Relativity?
You said you would not believe my answer. Are you lying now
or were you lying then?
You don't know the answer, and can't answer the question
(and you won't find it on Google either), proving that
you're some kind of half baked "applied physics" jerk who
can't understand the SPOG which is based on "real Physics".
Screw psycho, go back to alt.atheism and talk to your
asshole buddies, and get off this thread. You're worthless
as a scientist and worst of all intellectualLy BORING!
I guess I forgot that to win an argument, I must swear, insult
and USE CAPITAL LETTERS. Does that help my argument? You seem
to think it helps yours.
You have shown you cannot answer challenges to your wild
assumptions which means you know they are wrong and you are
still just hoping no one will notice. Unfortunately for you,
they have noticed. You are the joke of the newsgroups.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================