George Hammond wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:33 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:
George Hammond wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:47:54 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:
SNIP AGGRAVATED ATHEISM RANT
[Hammond]
Your post contains nothing but UNSUPPORTED ASSERTIONS
lacking any factual evidence, while my post is based on peer
reviewed and published papers.
Your commentary is idiotic, juvenile and reflects a low
intelligence and little proficiency or experience in
Science.
You CLAIM to have a "PhD in Physics" but refuse to cite
your CV, your real name, or any verification of such. Your
commentary does not rise above the level of the average jr.
grade laboratory technician. Therefore, until you provide
verification of your educational claims, I must presume you
are a FAKE, a FRAUD and an IMPOSTER, and you are certainly
typical of the average ranting aggravated psychotic
atheistic nut.
Many atheist frauds claim false credentials, such as T.
Wake from alt.atheism who also claimed he was a "Physics
PhD" but investigation showed he was in fact a civil
engineer employed in bridge building, or TMG who claimed to
be a "Physics PhD" but who actually turned out to be a WHOI
("Whoee") employee who has a degree in "Ocean Physics" which
any halfwit engineering level graduate could achieve.
Judging from your language and science content surely you
fall in the same category, a half baked near do well
"applied physics" nut, at best, and probably unemployed
judging from your lengthy weekday posts. You're a worthless
screwball.
Finally, because all these screwballs claim they can't
post their CV because they have "high security gov't jobs"
and must remain anonymous (which is crap); I posted a TEST
QUESTION that any COMPETENT Physics PhD should be able to
answer off the top of his head:
Physics PhD Test Question
What is the relationship between the
Dirac gamma matrices of QED and the
Christoffel Symbols of General Relativity?
You don't know the answer, and can't answer the question
(and you won't find it on Google either), proving that
you're some kind of half baked "applied physics" jerk who
can't understand the SPOG which is based on "real Physics".
Screw psycho, go back to alt.atheism and talk to your
asshole buddies, and get off this thread. You're worthless
as a scientist and worst of all intellectualLy BORING!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================
[Doug, anonymous unverified Physics PhD claimant]
So Hammond is unable to support his laughable proposals so he
snips the part that shows him to be wrong and tells people to
leave. That shows he knows he is wrong and has no business bothering
intelligent people with his ignorance or hope or delusions or whatever
it is that makes him say really embarrassing things so that he looks
really bad.
[Hammond]
Look jerk, you haven't posted ONE ON TOPIC SCIENTIFIC
STATMENT since you arrived on this thread. All you do is
keep mouthing the hand waving phrase "word salad" in
response to everything I say..............Finally I went
looking for the reason for this "non-scientific response" by
a supposed "Physics PhD"........ and sure enough... it turns
out you're a FAKE, a FRAUD, and an IMPOSTER claiming an
unverifiable degree and and posting anonymously.
So you used the same methods you used in your spog-- wild
speculation and delusion.
My degrees are perfectly fine and are not subject to your
approval.
Growth deficit, fusion frequency and other nonsense do not
constitute any kind of proof. You should know that as well
but you get mad when people point out your mistakes.
To top it all off, you can't even answer a "physicis PhD
test question" that any COMPETENT Physics PhD could answer
off the top of his head in 25 words.
Lets see, you claim to have somewhere between 2 and 2.5 degrees
(I assume to 3 significant figures) but you cannot even
spell physics. Was that why you failed graduate school?
Turns out, you're nothing but a ranting atheistic nut.
If you can't say something on topic, and scientific.......
screw.... get outta here.... you're boring and worthless.
Maybe boring and worthless to you but I am right in my
physics and I have my degrees and career to look on.
You have ignored all the science I have pointed out as
well as your religious mistakes. Proofs were not done
that way in my graduate school.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================