Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Apr 25, 10:19 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 25, 11:40 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:

Missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van Allen
Belts. shrug

Again - what "unmanned missions" are you talking about?

Again, missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van
Allen Belts. shrug

3rd time now - what missions? Are they imaginary missions that
happened only in your head, or missions that actually took place which
you have documentation of some kind in support?


Oh, the same garbage from fat Gisse again. You were pointed out of
your bullsh*t errors many times over. Get lost. Don�t come back
before you actually understand the stuff you came up with.

Nope - you farted and ran away from the discussion because you
couldn't even read the data sheets.

Not quiet, you failed to understand the material I have presented, and
worst of all you also failed to understand the materials you pulled
out. That is why knowing a few buzz words cannot get you that college
degree. That is why you are an n�th-year (which I have lost count)
super senior at the very prestigious university of Alaska. shrug

Not my fault you can't read basic instrument specifications or read
for comprehension.


In the meantime, the Chinese are �going back to the moon�. I wonder
if they will play the game along and be content with being second.
This would be very easy to do. All you need is a decent special
effect director. Or would they expose and embarrass NASA?