GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
On Apr 26, 4:41*pm, "John Smith" wrote:
"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:42:40 GMT, George Hammond
wrote:
On 26 apr, 00:34, George Hammond wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:10:18 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote:
On 25 apr, 01:14, George Hammond wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:45:41 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote:
On 23 apr, 23:25, George Hammond wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:55:03 -0700 (PDT),
[Hammond]
Wrong Pizzaman. Religion is FOUNDED on exactly my
explanation of "existence". In case you haven't noticed 85%
of the world's population are adherents to one of the 5
major faiths. This means 85% of the world agrees with my
definition of "existence" in principle when it comes to the
scientific phenomenon of "God".
You are saying that religious people generally admit that the only
reason why something exists is because they believe it to exist?
Peter van Velzen
April 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
[Hammond]
Of course not, don't be ridiculous. People (any people)
believe what they see.
What the SPOG proves is that NOBODY can see true reality
because we never reach full growth, and therefore we see a
CURVED VERSION of reality.
Now, unaware people think this "curved version " is true
reality, but more aware people discovered long ago that it
is curved, and therefore part of true reality is missing, or
"invisible".
Religious people are simply people who KNOW ABOUT IT,
while atheists, the uneducated, stupid or ignorant people
DON'T KNOW IT.
The religious people call the phenomenon "God" while
ignorant and unaware people don't even notice it, until it
eventually kills them due to an accident, healthl effects,
mental effects or lact of the ability to protect themselves
from predators (Evil so called).
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================
Research has shown that the more educated people are the greater the
chance of them being atheists.
So I am afraid you are mistaken.
[Hammond]
There isn't a head of state in the world, and few if any
high ranking public officials who would say that he was an
atheist. Common opinion holds that public officals are less
ignorant than the highly educated. So I'm afraid you're
mistaken.
[Peter van Velzen]
I wasn't talking about politicians.
[Hammond]
*I was, I referred to "ignorant and unaware people",
Oh ..... so you change the base criteria, just to make another ignorant, and
uninformed, point?
politicians are examples of people who are NOT IGNORANT OR
UNAWARE.
They aren't?
Openly looking at the way some of the ways they used to "lead the world" or
create laws, totally contradicts your asinine assertion.
* Academics DO NOT lead the world, politicians DO.
????
So?
That has nothing to do with the point of the discussion.
[Peter van Velzen]
The research was done at university
The more years students had been studying there,
the greater the percentage of atheists.
[Hammond]
* This merely proves that modern Academia is very corrupt,
sleazy, and backward. *There is no law that says highly
educated people can't be corrupt, sleazy or backward.
No ... but there is no EVIDENCE to support your bellowing ignorance.
You claim to be a scientist ........... but you NEVER seem to provide ANY
valid evidence.
No, there is no more a law that says educated people cannot be corrupt,
sleazy or backward ..... no more than there is a law for that applies to
politicians .... OR YOU!
[Peter van Velzen]
An atheist politician on the other hand,
would have better chances telling a lie,
and saying he "trusted in God".
[Hammond]
* By the same token academics have a better chance of
telling a lie and saying they are atheists and getting away
with it. *I'm sure many of the scared lower echelon
academics are dong just that to keep their job. *So what's
your point?
The point is ... do you have ANY VALID evidence to supprt that outrageously
ignorant claim?
or, as is true to your nature, are you once again just bellowing unsupported
ignorance out of your asshole?!?!?!?
* Surely you're not going to attempt to refute the SPOG
using "unsupported conjectural assertions", are you?
??????????
Your "S.P.O.C. is totally "suported" by unscientific conjecture and empty
assertions.
You have to SUPPORT IT * (and you haven't ... not one bit) .... others don't
need to prove it is wrong.
[Peter van Velzen]
Do you expect all atheist politicians to be completely honest like me?
I don't.
[Hammond]
* Same goes for academics, so what?
Peter van Velzem
April 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
PS
And don't you mind Ken calling you a crackpot.
He himself is not intelligent enough to understand my comment about
you being more than an asshole.
[Hammond]
* Look Dutch, Usenet is crawling with criminals, cons
posting from death row, drug addicts, drunks, child
molesters, pedophiles, gun nuts, Nazis, serial killers, wife
beaters, anti Semitic psychos, war criminals, torturers,
sadistic kidnappers, sex trade slave masters, people dying
of terminal V.D., stalkers, foreign spies, suicide bombers,
homicidal Jihadists, KKK members and psychos of all
description.
including George Hammond.-
Hammond's a gas bag (in addition to being a Crackpot)
|