View Single Post
  #109  
Old April 26th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
Peter Webb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 95
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax


"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 25, 6:25 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Apr 25, 5:46 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


Why the lack of Usenet/Group interest in anything JAXA SELENE?


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/3a4022...
Brad Guth


That link goes to one of your rants on a different forum.


I don't think Usenet lacks interest in Jaxa; I think Usenet lacks
interest
in Brad Guth.


HTH


That's to be expected.


Since JAXA/Selene is all about our moon, and soon enough orbiting at
merely 10 km with those TC optics recording that physically dark
surface at one meter/pixel, and therefore why is it not worthy of your
expertise?


It is. Post some images of the landing sites. If there aren't any, what
is
the relevance?


JAXA/Selene has by now at least dozens if not hundreds of their crisp
and clear TC frames per given landing site.



Why do you believe this is true?


Oddly they are not
sharing. In fact, even their wide/telephoto HDTV images are extremely
limited and having been frame by frame modified in order to exclude
most of the lunar mineral hue/color saturations, as well as utilizing
a minimal amount of the available dynamic range.


You say that the Japanese are falsifying wide view television images of the
moon. Why would they do that? What do you think they are hiding in these
images? Aliens from Area 41?



Even at 10 m/pixel is more than good enough as is.
. - Brad Guth


No, I supplied the calculations showing it was nowhere near good enough.


Still the same old silly brown-nosed boy, are you not.


No, I am a mathematician with an interest in optics.





Of course, if you would like to post the highest resolution photos of the
landing sites that you have access to, I could go through the physics
with
an actual example.

So why don't you do that?


They're all available from JAXA. Why don't you ask for yourself,


Because I am not trying to prove that Apollo was a hoax. If you want to use
photos as proof that it was a hoax, you really need to be able to produce
the photos. No photos, no evidence.



or
wait until unavoidably they can't help but deliver those 1m/pixel
images.


The images are 10m/pixel, and so would not possibly show the LEM.


Of course China can always dive in for the same or better
resolution.


Yes. If Apollo was a hoax, and there are so many ways it could be disproved,
funny that not one government has ever bother attempted to find out.


. - Brad Guth


Ads
 

Freelance sites - Debt Consolidation - MPAA - Credit - Remortgages