On Apr 25, 6:25 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Apr 25, 5:46 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Why the lack of Usenet/Group interest in anything JAXA SELENE?

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/3a4022...
Brad Guth

That link goes to one of your rants on a different forum.

I don't think Usenet lacks interest in Jaxa; I think Usenet lacks
interest
in Brad Guth.

HTH

That's to be expected.

Since JAXA/Selene is all about our moon, and soon enough orbiting at
merely 10 km with those TC optics recording that physically dark
surface at one meter/pixel, and therefore why is it not worthy of your
expertise?

It is. Post some images of the landing sites. If there aren't any, what is
the relevance?

JAXA/Selene has by now at least dozens if not hundreds of their crisp
and clear TC frames per given landing site. Oddly they are not
sharing. In fact, even their wide/telephoto HDTV images are extremely
limited and having been frame by frame modified in order to exclude
most of the lunar mineral hue/color saturations, as well as utilizing
a minimal amount of the available dynamic range.


Even at 10 m/pixel is more than good enough as is.
. - Brad Guth

No, I supplied the calculations showing it was nowhere near good enough.

Still the same old silly brown-nosed boy, are you not.


Of course, if you would like to post the highest resolution photos of the
landing sites that you have access to, I could go through the physics with
an actual example.

So why don't you do that?

They're all available from JAXA. Why don't you ask for yourself, or
wait until unavoidably they can't help but deliver those 1m/pixel
images. Of course China can always dive in for the same or better
resolution.
.. - Brad Guth