View Single Post
  #102  
Old April 26th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
Peter Webb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 90
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax


"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 25, 5:46 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Why the lack of Usenet/Group interest in anything JAXA SELENE?


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/3a4022...
Brad Guth


That link goes to one of your rants on a different forum.

I don't think Usenet lacks interest in Jaxa; I think Usenet lacks
interest
in Brad Guth.

HTH


That's to be expected.

Since JAXA/Selene is all about our moon, and soon enough orbiting at
merely 10 km with those TC optics recording that physically dark
surface at one meter/pixel, and therefore why is it not worthy of your
expertise?


It is. Post some images of the landing sites. If there aren't any, what is
the relevance?


Even at 10 m/pixel is more than good enough as is.
. - Brad Guth



No, I supplied the calculations showing it was nowhere near good enough.

Of course, if you would like to post the highest resolution photos of the
landing sites that you have access to, I could go through the physics with
an actual example.

So why don't you do that?


Ads
 

Mortgages - Artsbook - Car Accident Attorney Los Angeles - IKA Lab Equipment - Song Lyrics