On Apr 25, 12:40 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:04 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 21, 10:53 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
The task could be achieved through unmanned missions not necessarily
short men painted green. shrug
What "unmanned missions" ?
Missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van Allen
Belts. shrug
What is the nonsense about the Soviet spy antenna records? Is that
where you got these little green men from?
How do you suppose these Apollo astronauts with 0.25g/cm^2 of shield
is going to come up totally unharmed after being bombarded with 3E-14
solar mass per year of energy? Little green men reported from
unclassified Soviet antenna spy whatever archive?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind
The higher energy particles would damage your DNA with higher
probability of causing some sorts of cancer in a few years. The lower-
energy ones would manifest shorter term illness. It is not advisable
to be bombarded with 3E-14 solar mass per year of energy at earth’s
orbit with just 0.25g/cm^2 of shielding from the command module.
shrug
Oh this again? You were proven wrong with the actual ACE/SOHO
spacecraft data and here you are repeating the same **** again.
Oh, the same garbage from fat Gisse again. You were pointed out of
your bullsh*t errors many times over. Get lost. Don’t come back
before you actually understand the stuff you came up with.
In the meantime, the Chinese are ‘going back to the moon’. I wonder
if they will play the game along and be content with being second.
This would be very easy to do. All you need is a decent special
effect director. Or would they expose and embarrass NASA?
China could bring their existing lunar mapping and science mission
down to within 10 km, in so much as accomplishing better than 1 m/
pixel resolution images of our Apollo landing sights, of which would
offer as much information as necessary, and they could do this as part
of their opening Olympic games or shortly thereafter.
Technically, in optical/telephoto resolution from the altitude of 10
km could bring home the real thing, of showing us each of those final
downrange paths and of their supposed soft-landing sites, or perhaps
those of the not so soft, as hard-landings or impact deployments of
our unmanned/robotic units.
. - Brad Guth