George Hammond wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:42:41 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:
VITA FOR GEORGE HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester MA, USA (Deans List)
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University,
Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68
Northeastern Univ. Boston MA
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt
at N.U. and who is presently Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proo...ammond5s1.html
[Hammond]
Ok, I've read your post, and have concluded with absolute
certainty that my first impression was correct: Either you
are a fraud and not actually a PhD as you claim, or are
actually a PhD in some phony applied physics field such as
"Atmospheric Physics" which any mentally challenged halfwit
could achieve, or, there actually are Universities who will
grant a "mercy degree" in physics to incompetent,
unoriginal, and worthless stooges such as you.
[Doug]
Thank you for more humor as you try to thrash your way to
some position that does not look too bad. Since you failed
out of graduate school does that mean that you are not even
up to the "mentally challenged halfwit" level of getting some
PhD? Or did not you not qualify for a "mercy degree"?
[Hammond]
You claim you're a Physics PhD. I'll believe it when you
post your CV. You're too argumentative to be credible....
no competent Physics PhD could possibly be as asinine and
trivial as you are... you're obviously a low brow
horselaughing stooge and a bozo.
And, of course YOU are the one showing how high brow and
civil people with degrees in physics are. I am sorry but
I cannot match your anger.
One of the things you are missing is that my opinion of my
career is not dependent on your approval. I am quite happy
with what I have done. Your lack of accomplishment is not
my problem.
You are not going to change so I will continue to laugh
at your new ideas (you are going to come up with some new
"theories I hope) and enjoy passing them around for
levity.
By the way, no one has replied who does not consider your
"theories" worthy of a laugh.
Dozen's of anonymous jackass high school dropouts show up
on Usenet claiming they're "PhD's", who are you kidding?
Oh... going to claim anonymity as an excuse for not
posting your CV?.... then answer a Physics test question for
us:
What is the relationship between the Dirac
Gamma matrices of QED and the Christoffel Symbols
Of General relativity?
A 25 word answer will be sufficent.
If you can't answer that question off the top of your
head, you're a f---in phoney.
And even if you find the answer by searching Google, I
still won't believe you until I see a CV.
You are getting desperate aren't you? You contradict yourself
within one sentence. You want an answer but have already said
you will not believe that answer. There is as much logic
in this as there is in your so called proof.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================