On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:13:57 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:
George Hammond wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:46:41 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:
[Hammond]
I've got 2.5 degrees in Physics asshole.
[Doug]
You are outranked as I have 3.0. I finished graduate
school in physics.
[Hammond]
That doesn't mean you're not an ineffectual and helpless
moron when it comes to forensically investigating a
scientific proof of God, and don't ever forget it!
[Doug]
But none of that matters since none of what you are
posting has anything to do with physics.
[Hammond]
That statement is either a monumental faux pas, or you're
a pathological liar.
Fact is Hammond has discovered that the Linear Algebra of
Psychometry Factor Analysis is CAUSALLY IDENTICAL to the
structure of linearized Gravity in Relativity thus proving
that "God" is in fact a "relativistic curvature of
subjective spacetime". QED; God exists.
Therefore the scientific Proof of God (SPOG) is DE FACTO
an "applied physics theory", and you don't know what you're
talking about.
[Doug]
You are
attempting to pervert logic and religion and somehow
make silly assumptions like the Greeks not knowing the
difference between 12 and 13 (that one brought howls of
laughter from everyone) and rewriting the number of
gods (all of which are man made creations anyway). Trying
to prove that nonexistent gods are a result of your theory
is pretty bizarre, even you must admit.
[Hammond]
Listen you over privileged PhD asshole, this amateur
philosophy crap I'm engaging in with these high school
graduate amateurs is because that's all they are capable of
discussing.
This is pretty humorous. First you flaunt your education,
then, upon finding out you are outranked, you insult the
education. Again, you are trying to have it both ways.
They don't know what an eigenvector is, or a
2nd rank tensor. They don't even know polar from Cartesian
coordinates.... so I have to talk "philosophy" with them...
such as the "Anthropic Principle" which is a hermaphrodite
amalgam of Philosophy and Physics as you well know. But the
fact that a thousand amateurs or Liberal Arts PhD's want to
talk to me about "God" DOES NOT MEAN that the SPOG isn't a
"Physics Theory". It certainly is a Physics theory!
It is a physics theory in the same sense that Seto and
noeinstein and Henri Wilson and rbwinn and others have
what they call physics theories. You have strung together
a set of meaningless phrases and attempted to call it
science.
How many people have ever agreed with you?
By the way, where is the physics in it?
[Doug]
By the way, insults and swearing are not the way to win
arguments. Those who made it through school prefer logic,
reasoning and facts.
[Hammond]
I'm the one who prefers logic, reasoning and facts, not
you! There are worse transgressions of Science than
swearing; for instance the transgression YOU are guilty of
which is the high handed, overpriviliged presumptive disdain
you have for anyone claiming to have discovered a physics
proof of God.... or your blatant presumption that "Physics
cannot prove God"
You are the one swearing at those who disagree with you. I am
not swearing at you, only laughing. That is different.
There is no scientific proof of god since any of the thousands
of gods men have invented are only subject to belief, not
physics. They are not real. I would be more than happy to
see either scientific proof of any god or even a shred of
evidence for any god. I have spent a lot of time studying
the world's religion and have seen nothing of the sort.
Get with it kid, not only does Physics have to tackle
dirty jobs like building an Atomic Bomb (and you can bet
there was plenty of swearing while that was going on).....
Physics ALSO has to deal with the issue of finding out if
there really is a God,
There is none so you can relax now.
and if so what it is.... and that is
just what I've proved.... that "God" is a real physical
(relativistic perceptual) effect.
There has been no proof. There is unsubstantiated babble.
Nothing you have said has anything to do with proof. I have
read it over many times as I have shown it to people for a
laugh.
And that's history, Mr.
You don't know what you're talking about, and excuse me
if I'm not impressed with you're PhD in Physics... I've
talked to several PhD physicists, and frankly I'm not too
impressed.
So you wanted us to be impressed with your 2.5 degrees but
you are not impressed with 3.0 degrees. I am not surprised.
Professor Chris Isham for instance showed
nothing but amateur ignorance and presumption when I talked
to him about the SPOG.... or J. Baugh, one of Finklestein's
PhD's, who showed nothing but aggravated juvenile ignorance
when it came to the phenomena of Religion... someone who
should at least know enough to be polite and cautious for
heaven's sake!
They looked at your babble and saw it for what it was. You
can laugh at it or feel pity. There is nothing there to
believe since it has no relation to either science or a
proof.
So I'm not that impressed with you're PhD in physics,
not until I find out if you can stand on one foot with your
eyes closed and point to true North all at the same time.
Impressed no, jealous yes.
Has anyone ever agreed with your "theory"?
VITA FOR GEORGE HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester MA, USA (Deans List)
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University,
Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68
Northeastern Univ. Boston MA
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt
at N.U. and who is presently Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proo...ammond5s1.html
[Hammond]
Ok, I've read your post, and have concluded with absolute
certainty that my first impression was correct: Either you
are a fraud and not actually a PhD as you claim, or are
actually a PhD in some phony applied physics field such as
"Atmospheric Physics" which any mentally challenged halfwit
could achieve, or, there actually are Universities who will
grant a "mercy degree" in physics to incompetent,
unoriginal, and worthless stooges such as you.
Your repeated references to "howling with laughter" are a
dead give away..... you're apparently so utterly stupid and
lowbrow, to say nothing of incompetent, that you're given to
embarrassing fits of inappropriate laughter... the hallmark
sign of congenital idiocy.
The SPOG is a classic by the book proof, of a
longstanding and unexplained physical phenomenon.
You're worthless and no more intelligent or learned than
the average laboratory technician.
Get the **** off this thread, and stay off it!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================