GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:43:13 -0700 (PDT), Errol
wrote:
On Apr 23, 1:46 pm, "Andy F." wrote:
An event has to happen BEFORE it can be observed.The light from an
object
has to travel to your eyes before you can see it.
If the object is close by, this takes a few billionths of a second.When
you
look at the sun, you're seeing what was there 8 minutes ago.And if you
look
through a powerful telescope, you can observe events which hapened
millions
of years ago.
Ouch! waiting in anticipation for GH to respond to that.
[Hammond]
Already responded to it..... he's too mentally chalenged to
even understand the point of the discussion.
He's mentally challenged?
He's not the one everyone's lauging at!
The universe around us is created by human perception. I agree with
this in the sense that humans "conjure" the universe out of a chaotic
background of overlapping interference patterns and through the act of
observation, give form and solidity to this reality, but why do we
create a history that according to GH does not exist.
[Hammond]
It all comes down to the perational meaning of the world
"existence" as any fool can see.
any fool can see that there is no such word as perational ...... you
mis-spelled word ....
and totally ignored the dictionary meaning of existence that I already
posted (contradicting your crap).
there IS NO operational
meaning to the world "existence" except via a human
observer.
Repeating psychotically insane bull **** only makes it smell worse!
THEREFORE, not only did Man "create the universe"
by the mere fact of his appearance 200,000 years ago, he
ALSO "created time and space, and all of history" at the
same time.
Go back to the "ward", psycho! It's time for your meds.
This is a bit
like the preacher who, when confronted by evidence of dinosaur bones,
claims that god put them there, already pre-aged at several hundred
millions of years old.
[Hammond]
the preacher is correct when you analyze the operational
meaning of "existence".
No.
When you analyze the operational meaning of "existence" - you use the
dictionary references and definitions I gave.
You DON'T use George Hammonds unscientific, arrogant, deranged delusions!
[Hammond]
Start learning Errol,
this Philawsephy bull**** is only the FOOTHILLS of the
scientific proof of God that has been discovered.... this is
just "playing with pedants and amateurs".... because they
know no Relativity.... the REAL DISCOVERY which makes all
this Philawsepy crap academic, is the fact that Hammond has
discovered that human perception is CURVED, and this PROVES
that there is an "invisible world" (called heaven" and that
there is an "invisible man" called "God" who lives there.
You're probably not even qualified to discuss Linear
Algebra and Relativity.... you're only qualified to play in
the sandbox of Philawsephy with the rest of these clowns...
whom I only talk to for publicity purposes.
Just bellowing the same old, same old, ignorant ****!
|