GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
On Apr 23, 1:47*am, "John Smith" wrote:
"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:54:58 GMT, George Hammond
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:09:01 +0100, "Andy F."
wrote:
[Andy F.]
There's a human opinion based on sensory perception that the universe has
been around for billions of years.
[Hammond]
* There is overwhelming evidence based on scientific
deduction that *IF* a person existed a billion years ago,
then he would have indeed observed the Universe to exist. *I
throughly agree with that and anybody who doesn't is
certifiably either crazy or incompetent.
Evidence is based on facts - not YOUR outrageously insane, psychotic crap!
You are the crazy one - as everyone else has pointed out!
[Andy F.]
This means the universe existed before
humans did.
[Hammond]
WRONG, DEAD WRONG ANDY.
1) *The "existence", of anything, depends entirely on the
* * *sensory perception of Man. *There IS NO definition
* * *of the word "existence" that is independent of the
* * *action of a HUMAN observer.
Obviously your psychotic blinders kept you from seing the dictionary
definition I provided, which contradicted your ****!
You make this claim as though it were fact - when it, like everything else
you post, is outrageously unscientific and unsupported garbage.
* * * * Proof: *If all men died tomorrow at 9am, there
* * *would no longer be any way to ascertain at 9:01am
* * *if ANYTHING whatsoever "existed". *The word
* * *"existence" has no meaning whatsoever
* * *without the existence of human beings.
That is not a proof, asshole; it's merely more of your insane ramblings.
2) * But what your statement above says, is that
* * *circumstantial evidence indicates (indeed
* * *conclusively) that *IF* a human observer existed
* * *a billion years ago, then he "would have" observed
* * *that the Universe "existed". *And I thoroughly
* * *agree with that statement.
Gee ... you agree with your own insane crap!
THAT'S NOT WHAT HE SAID, dip****!
3) * However, in point of fact, no *such human observer
* * *did exist a billion years ago, therefore, by paragraph
* * *1 above, the Universe actually did *NOT* "exist"
* * *a billion years ago.... even though it "would have"
* * *if anybody was around to see it.
Paragraph 1 was nothing more than your own mentally corrupt, and
unscientific, assertions.
You cannot use your own, previous, insane and unsupported assertions to come
to a conclusion that actually means anything .......... twit!
Were you a REAL scientist (or even sane), you would know that.
THERE IS VALID EVIDENCE that the universe existed before man came along.
That is a FACT!
It is also a fact that scientifically, you don't know your ass from a hole
in the ground!
[Andy F.]
So it's not possible for humans to have created the universe.
[Hammond]
Wrong again.
* The above proof demonstrates conclusively that Man
"caused" the Universe to come into "existence" since ONLY A
HUMAN can confirm that anything "exists".
Flushng crap, again.
There is no "proof" above ... only your deranged ramblings.
How about this, amoeba brain ..................
"Confirmation" of the existence of something IS NOT THE SAME as the actual
EXISTENCE of that object!
Or is that too tough for you to comprehend!?!?!?!
* In short, "existence" is a PROPERTY of the human mind. No
people, no existence, of anything!
In short ........... you're a turd pretending to be human!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And, in one word................. BINGO!!!
|