View Single Post
  #67  
Old April 23rd 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,525
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 21, 7:53 pm, wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:12 am, Sam Wormley wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when
I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text -


The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal.


No--The high gain antenna was tracking the moon for several hours.


No contradiction there. The astronauts were in low-earth orbit sending
live audio-stream and video-stream to base.

Bart Sibrel found a massive scene blunder where Earth is shown to be
"far-away" by actors on then for brief moment real Earth is seen close-
up on another window. The far-away depiction of Earth was a picture of
Earth over some cellophane.

The Apollo moon-landings were a total and complete fraud. The Japanese
satellite lunar photos already show significant divergence from NASA
movie-set photos. They lost all 700 boxes of original video, all moon
rock, all saturn plans. Apollo photos include massive blunders with
prop-set markings on sand, non-parallel shadows, spot-lights,
inconsistency in shoots. No explanation for van-allen belt. They can't
go back because they can't solve problems they supposedly solved 50
years ago in under a decade?

THE APOLLO MOON LANDINGS WERE FAKED

and the truth shall set you free....


Even those JAXA/Selene images are not what they should be. It seems
those trusty MIB of our NASA damage-control got into the works of
JAXA, just in time to have insured JAXA would eliminate most of the
color hue saturation that's related to our physically dark but mineral
rich moon.

Even at that, the JAXA moon looks nothing like our NASA/Apollo moon.
.. - Brad Guth
Ads
 

Teen Chat - Loans - Mobile Phone - MPAA - Codigo Da Vinci