On Apr 22, 10:29 am, Hugh Semmler wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:

On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...
Find more at:
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/
Oh.
When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.
I want to see the flag
Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)

Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more
than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites.
With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed)
could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel.

It's only going to get better, as time will eventually have the JAXA/
Selene orbiting at merely 10 km, giving us a raw 1m/pixel look at
those supposed NASA/Apollo landing sites..
. - Brad Guth

And wont you look Very foolish

Nearly nine years and counting, haven't so far, and of others having
this similar deductive mindset as of the very get-go are in the same
boat. But then unlike yourself and others of your mostly Semitic and
Third Reich brown-nosed kind, I'll go along with whatever's the best
available science, especially if it's made fully objective by other
than just within the NASA/Apollo O-Ring cult.
.. - Brad Guth