April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On Apr 21, 1:32 pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On Apr 21, 12:02 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:22 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:
On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...
Find more at:
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/
Oh.
When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.
I want to see the flag
Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.
The Apollo programme was a total hoax.
JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)
Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more
than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites.
With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed)
could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel.
Do you actually believe you can get a factor of ten increase in
resolution from photoshop?
I can get anything from photoshop.
Try PhotoZoom.
.. - BG
|