View Single Post
  #49  
Old April 22nd 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 999
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 22, 9:10 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.


http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...


Find more at:


http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/


Is this another bogus topic?

Besides all the JAXA images (plus the other 99.99% of them we're not
even being shown) that so far do not support our NASA/Apollo ruse,
seems as though you haven't taken hardly anything other into account,
that which clearly proves we have not walked on our moon.


This post is "more" evidence, not the entire case. Over the years I've
posted various factoids proving the case for the Apollo Hoax. Included
were photographic evidence, circumstantial facts, physics analysis and
the basic math of parallel shadows and distant light-sources.

No matter how factual the case may be, most people (especially those
who claim to be educated in physics/math) simply won't consider it.
These people are simply weak-minded and only want to believe what
makes them happy. Like a child foolishly insisting that the tooth
fairy really exists when confronted with a pantheon of objective
reality.

The intent of my posts here are to help future analysis understand
true ignorance. Of course, they (and myself) know that is not my posts
which serve to demonstrate this phenomenon, it's most of the resulting
responses.



BTW, why exactly are those Google/Usenet gold stars locked up?
. - Brad Guth


Ads
 

Repair Bad Credit - Credit Counseling - Gas Electricity - Business Gifts - Loans