On Apr 6, 9:48*am, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
wrote:
Dear Benj:

"Benj" wrote in message

...

On Apr 6, 1:44 am, "FrediFizzx" wrote:
...
Most likely we just don't know what all the
quantum objects are yet. *Or their possible
interactional configurations. *Hopefully we
will get some more clues after the LHC
has been running for awhile.

Well, provided it doesn't open a black hole
and the earth gets sucked into it...

Let us hope Hawking was right, then. *That way, if we do manage
to make a classical black hole out of a few nucleii, it will
entirely evaporate in a tiny super hot fireball in fractions of a
second.

nuclei
Well, how do they make a classic black hole if black holes are
relativistic? They don't. Classic dark stars cannot make any dumb
event horizon as their mass is finite. We are safe if Hawking is
wrong--and he was for the destruction of information.

For further talks about "black hole", substitut "unicorn".

-Aut