Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote on Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:21:30 -0700:

On Apr 2, 3:35 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote on Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:51:36 -0700:

Professor Carlip addressed your claim that the speed of gravity being
several billion times the speed of light in the following article. I
have seen no public refutation to his work.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909087
As pointed several times in this newsgroup Carlip is wrong about
interactions.

Carlip paper received a formal reply by van Flandern on:

Experimental Repeal of the Speed Limit for Gravitational,
Electrodynamic, and Quantum Field Interactions. 2002: Found. Phys. 32,
1031. Van Flandern, T; Vigier, J.P.
Yes, I found it in his website now. So, after Professor turned Dr. Van
Flandern's claim of infinite speed of gravity on its head, Dr. Van
Flandern reversed the favor by turning Professor Carlip's claim in
aberration of gravity on its very own head. It looks like Professor
Carlip has somehow ignored the speed of one star in his aberration
consideration. Has Professor Carlip offered any graceful retreat from
that mistake?

Carlip is at this newsgroup now, why do not ask him directly?



We've seen Steve Carlip's views on this before, this has been rehashed
many times. I suggest you use search to find the answers. You won't like
them though.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com