"Cary Kittrell" wrote in message
...
| In article "adman"
writes:
|
| "Cary Kittrell" wrote in message
| ...
| | In article "adman"
| writes:
| | Second Law of Thermodynamics supports the supernatural model of
origins.
| | 1. There is no natural means to increase usable energy in a closed
| system.
| | 2. The universe is decreasing in usable energy.
| | 3. Therefore, the initial energy of the universe must have
originated
| | supernaturally.
| | 4. The creation model conforms to the data.
| |
| |
| | Assumes that the universe came into being with the same
| | size and density we observe today.
| |
| | It didn't.
|
| You have observable evidence of such?
|
| Just the same dreary list of observational
| bases for the Big Bang that so many others have
| provided for you over the last few weeks.
| You know: confirmation of the ratios
| of the non-mentals with theory, overall
| galacic motions, large-scale isotropy
| and predicted temeprature of the CMB,
| very fine-scale anisotropies in the CMB
| (except for the absence of the fundamental
| in the power spectrum series, of course),
| und so weiter...

I expected someting more from you. I was wrong.

The singularity is a moot issue.Therefore the big bang is moot.




|
|
| -- cary
|
| |
| |
| | -- cary
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Evolution proposes only natural explanations.
| | Therefore, evolution contradicts a natural law.
| | Models that contradict data are unscientific.
| | Therefore, evolution as a model of origins is unscientific
| |
| | http://www.mbbc.us/creation/presentation.htm
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|