On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:48:05 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
wrote:

On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:43:21 -0700 (PDT), "Syd M."
wrote:

On Apr 2, 3:43 pm, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:24:26 GMT, Ye Old One wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:14:12 -0400, raven1
enriched this group when s/he wrote:

On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:33:02 -0500, "adman" wrote:

Second Law of Thermodynamics supports the supernatural model of origins.

What, in your understanding, is the 2LoT?

1. There is no natural means to increase usable energy in a closed system.
2. The universe is decreasing in usable energy.
3. Therefore, the initial energy of the universe must have originated
supernaturally.

Your conclusion does not follow from your premises, rendering the
remainder of your post moot.

Moot would be the wrong word.

He rendered his argument invalid as soon as he included the
supernatural in it.

He should have stayed mute.

We should be so lucky...
Sigh

PDW

I simply don't understand these idiots. What do they imagine they
achieve by being so in-our-face stupid?

It's like you've said yourself on more than one occasion. Idiots never
think they *are* idiots.