In article "adman" writes:

"Cary Kittrell" wrote in message
...
| In article "adman"
writes:
| Second Law of Thermodynamics supports the supernatural model of origins.
| 1. There is no natural means to increase usable energy in a closed
system.
| 2. The universe is decreasing in usable energy.
| 3. Therefore, the initial energy of the universe must have originated
| supernaturally.
| 4. The creation model conforms to the data.
|
|
| Assumes that the universe came into being with the same
| size and density we observe today.
|
| It didn't.

You have observable evidence of such?

Just the same dreary list of observational
bases for the Big Bang that so many others have
provided for you over the last few weeks.
You know: confirmation of the ratios
of the non-mentals with theory, overall
galacic motions, large-scale isotropy
and predicted temeprature of the CMB,
very fine-scale anisotropies in the CMB
(except for the absence of the fundamental
in the power spectrum series, of course),
und so weiter...


-- cary

|
|
| -- cary
|
|
|
|
| Evolution proposes only natural explanations.
| Therefore, evolution contradicts a natural law.
| Models that contradict data are unscientific.
| Therefore, evolution as a model of origins is unscientific
|
| http://www.mbbc.us/creation/presentation.htm
|
|
|
|