On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:28:29 -0500, "adman" wrote:


"raven1" wrote in message
.. .
| On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:25:30 -0500, "adman" wrote:
|
|
| "raven1" wrote in message
| .. .
| | On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:33:02 -0500, "adman" wrote:
| |
| | Second Law of Thermodynamics supports the supernatural model of
origins.
| |
| | What, in your understanding, is the 2LoT?
| |
| | 1. There is no natural means to increase usable energy in a closed
| system.
| | 2. The universe is decreasing in usable energy.
| | 3. Therefore, the initial energy of the universe must have originated
| | supernaturally.
| |
| | Your conclusion does not follow from your premises, rendering the
| | remainder of your post moot.
|
| I see you finally understand the defination of "Moot"
|
| I've understood it all along. It's good to see that you agree with me
| about its applicability to your post.

Can you show me where i said "i agree"?

By stating that I understand the definition of "moot" you were
implicitly stating that my usage of it was correct.

If not, it is just more intellectual dishonesty.

You wouldn't recognize intellectual honesty if you tripped over it.
Every one of your posts is full of scientific inaccuracies, logical
fallacies, and (as when you posted a link about the meniscus that
contradicted your own point) outright "own goals".




|
|
| |
| | 4. The creation model conforms to the data.
| |
| | Evolution proposes only natural explanations.
| | Therefore, evolution contradicts a natural law.
| | Models that contradict data are unscientific.
| | Therefore, evolution as a model of origins is unscientific
| |
| | http://www.mbbc.us/creation/presentation.htm
| |
|